Bhadohi,Marriage death under suspicious circumstances, murder charges against husband, mother-in-law, father-in-law, Jeth Jethani including Chachiya father-in-law.
September 14, 2019
भदोही।करेंट की चपेट में आने समाचार पत्र विक्रेता की मौत, परिजनों ने मुआवजे की मांग को लेकर किया चक्का
September 14, 2019
New Delhi, Aug 14 (IANS) The Bimal Jalan committee tasked to recommend the formula to be adopted for transfer of the RBI’s surplus to the government has finalised its report, official sources said here on Wednesday.
According to the sources, the report of the panel examining the ideal size of capital reserves that the central bank should hold earlier contained a dissent note from former Finance Secretary Subhash Chandra Garg who has since been moved to the Power Ministry. The resulting vacancy was filled by the new Finance Secretary Rajiv Kumar in order to finalise the report.
“The report is more or less finalised. There will not be another meeting. We have discussed everything and now it’s the final report. The recommendation of transferring the surplus over 3-5 years remains the same. In the next few days, the report will be submitted to the RBI Governor”, an official source said after the panel meeting.
The source declined to specify on the details of the report or the quantum of reserves to be transferred to the government.
According to the sources, the recommendations have been “more or less” finalised and there will not be another meeting.
“It would be difficult to tell what is the exact amount of transfer or the calculation. Transfer would be in phased manner as is the practice,” one source said.
The report would be submitted to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in the next few days, he added.
According to the official sources, there was no longer any dissent in the panel. The six-member committee under former RBI Governor Bimal Jalan was appointed in December 2018 to review the RBI’s economic capital framework (ECF).
The Finance Ministry wanted the central bank to follow global best practices and transfer more surplus to the government and not overcapitalise itself by sitting on a huge amount of surplus currently estimated to be around Rs 9 lakh crore. This figure has, however, not been disclosed officially by the government or the RBI.
The surplus capital transfer would help the government meet its fiscal deficit target and undertake capital expenditure.
The government has set a fiscal deficit target for the current financial year of 3.3 per cent of the GDP, which was revised downward from 3.4 per cent pegged in the Union Budget for 2019-20.
The government is expecting Rs 90,000 crore dividend from the RBI in the current financial year as against Rs 68,000 crore received last fiscal.
The other key members of the committee include RBI Deputy Governor N.S. Vishwanathan, former of the RBI Deputy Governor Rakesh Mohan, Finance Secretary Rajiv Kumar and two RBI central board members — Bharat Doshi and Sudhir Mankad.
The government had been at loggerheads with the previous RBI Governor Urjit Patel over the Rs 9 lakh crore central bank surplus, leading to the latter’s abrupt resignation last year. The Finance Ministry was of the view that the surplus buffer of 28 per cent of gross assets maintained by the RBI is well above the global norm of around 14 per cent.
Following this, the RBI board in its meeting on November 19, 2018, decided to constitute a panel to examine ECF.
In the past, the issue of the ideal size of the RBI reserves was examined by three committees headed respectively by — V. Subrahmanyam in 1997, Usha Thorat in 2004 and Y.H. Malegam in 2013.
While the Subrahmanyam panel recommended building a 12 per cent contingency reserve, the Thorat panel suggested it should be maintained at a higher level of 18 per cent of the total assets of the central bank.
The RBI board did not accept the suggestions of the Thorat committee and decided to go with the recommendation of the Subrahmanyam committee.
The Malegam panel said the RBI should transfer an adequate amount of its profit to the contingency reserves annually but did not suggest any particular sum.